Who doesn’t love a ‘sexy’ run shoe? I suppose it does pose the question, ‘Can a run shoe be sexy?’ For me, the answer is yes! Just as it was when I used to ride racing bikes – my bikes were always sexy, it was compulsory!
So, the new incarnation from SCOTT hit all the boxes, rung all the bells and well and truly gave my eyes a woo hoo when I first clapped eyes on them in May 2016.
I have to be clear here, I was involved and worked with the SCOTT elite athletes in La Palma photographing the new apparel and shoes to be launched later this year and early in 2017.
The SUPERTRAC RC shoe is arguably the racing flagship for the brand that has been known for years for making darn fine excellent bikes. Well, ever since 2012, SCOTT have also been making darn fine run shoes, it’s just taken a while to get the message out. The Kinabalu Supertrac is still one of my favourite shoes. So good was the shoe, it beat many others in my test HERE.
The new SUPERTRAC RC has in all honesty little connection to the beefy 8mm drop trail shoe as listed above, however, it does carry over some of the traits.
Noticeable points are:
- Seamless upper and overlays
- Form fitting performance tongue
- Reinforced toe cap
- Radilal ‘360’ traction
- EVA cushioning
The RC looks completely different to the Kinabalu Supertrac and the back/yellow ‘RC’ colour combination reflects the ‘RC’ range from the road bike and mountain bike range. I like that, I like that connection. It very clearly states, ‘This is the best of what we offer!’
For the Supertrac RC the stats are as follows:
- 5mm drop
- Forefoot cushioning height : 17.5mm
- Heel cushioning height : 22.5mm
- Cushioning : AeroFoam + (same as Supertrac inline)
- Weight : 270g in US9 men with insole in (some brands weight them without insoles)
- Outsole : Outdoor Industry award winning 360° geometry made in wet rubber compound.
The Supertrac RC is not the lightest shoe but it does have plenty of cushioning and protection with 17.5/22.5mm of AeroFoam.
At 5mm drop, the shoe is certainly designed for an efficient mid to forefoot striker in contrast to the 8mm drop Kinabalu Supertrac that most definitely is a more ‘forgiving’ shoe.
Ultimately though, the RC is all about the ‘new’ grip that has been tweaked and tweaked through 2016 with feedback both in training and racing from athletes such as Andy Symonds, Jo Meek, Marco De Gasperi, Ruth Croft and the SCOTT team manager, Martin Gaffuri. The 360° geometry made in wet rubber compound is a real, real winner! The outsole is made for racing and training on trails where rock (wet or dry) is in abundance. The outsole though has less depth to the lug than say the Kinabalu Supertrac and so therefore grip is not as secure in mud.
Initially I was disappointed that the tongue was not gusseted. A gusseted tongue is becoming normal now on many shoes and for me just makes sense. The RC does though have a form fitting tongue and it does hold the foot nice and firm.
Seamless upper is a winner, in theory it should mean that you have no possibility for blisters or abrasion from any seams. I did have a slight issue with rubbing on one of my toes where the shoe bends in the propulsive face, however, I do think that it is due to the test shoe being slightly too big. I will know more with testing.
Cushioning for me was a surprise and I have to say I was surprised by the relatively hard feel of the shoe. I had expected a more plush ride but that may well come with more runs. It’s still early days in the test and the is just an initial first impression.
Heal box is snug and really does hold the foot secure. The toe box is really well protected and therefore ideal for rocky, technical and mountain runs. The lacing is very secure and does compensate for the lack of the gusseted tongue, however, I am really surprised SCOTT didn’t include a ‘lace locker‘ to store excess lace as they do on many of their other shoes. It’s just a little elastic that weighs nothing but is ideal for keeping loose lace ends out of the way… maybe it will be added to the shoes for when they go on sale in 2017?
This is a first impression review and without doubt, I think we are going to see the Supertrac RC appear on many trails and mountains in 2017. Lets face it, you’ll have no problem noticing them…! The combination of grip, good looks, cushioning and seamless upper is going to make the RC a winner. I will come back with a full and detailed review after another month of trail and mountain abuse.
Scott Supertrac RC HERE
Hi Ian, How is the width on them?
Width is ok but not super wide like an Altra or the standard fit inov-8. You must remember that the RC is going to be a flagship shoe for training or racing on trail, mountains and other technical trail, so, the shoe needs to feel precise.
Thanks Ian! Probably not going to be for me then with my paddle feet
Hi Ian, do you recommand this shoes for mountain ultra (100km/5000D+) ?
cheers
Yes of the fit is good for you and you don’t mind a slightly heavier shoe.
Pingback: Ultramarathon Daily News,Tue, Nov 22 - UltrarunnerPodcast.com
Looks like a potential high mountain technical racing shoe. Will definitely review it later on.
Ian,
I know you say the shoe’s made for running on rock but… does it have a rockplate in the sole to stop the spiky rocks stabbing your feet?
And I quote, “The ROCLITE has a META-SHANK and rock plate which is a great addition for keeping the rugged, sharp and gnarly stuff from penetrating through the sole and providing discomfort or bruising while running.”
Ian, have you got reviews mixed up? Question was about the Scott Supertrac. Cheers!
Sorry. Wrong response. Scott has no rockplate, doesn’t need it as the midsole is very firm and secure.
Nice preview. Any update on the shoe?
I’m on the fence about giving it a shot. I feel like I’m between sizes. 10.5 feels a little too snug and short, while 11 feels overall too big and I feel the toes box ceasing a bit.
Any thoughts on the insole? It seems to be a almost a sticky foam rubber and I feel my sock sticking to it. Worried about this causing friction between my foot and and sock.
Also, any thoughts on the perforations in the tongue? Do they let in any debris?
Still testing. But for me, they are true to size. Outsole is great on rock and trail etc but not on mud (no surprise). Tongue is good – no problems. Insole – no problems. Biggest issue for me is that the lacing comes very low and I find that it can potentially cause issues when the foot bends in the propulsive phase at the toes. For some it’s fine, others not.
Hi Ian
I also experienced the rubbing on toes from excess material over the toe box and wondered if this shoe just fits quite big.
I wear a Salomon 11.5 uk and in the same size the scott feels more (too?) roomy. Was that your experience?
Pingback: ON Cloudventure Shoe Review | iancorless.com – Photography, Writing, Talk Ultra Podcast
Hi Ian,
How does to compare to the (pretty much standard) Salomon S Lab Sense as a race shoe?
Pingback: Scott Kinabalu 2018 Review | iancorless.com – Photography, Writing, Talk Ultra Podcast
Pingback: SCOTT Supertrac RC 2 Shoe Review | iancorless.com – Photography, Writing, Talk Ultra Podcast