IAN CORLESS

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

MDS 120 Cappadocia 2026 – Stage 3

Posted on June 19, 2026 by talkultra

Balloons, Heat and Triumph: MDS Cappadocia 2026 Concludes in Spectacular Style

The final stage of MDS 120 Cappadocia delivered everything that makes this race so special: breathtaking scenery, challenging terrain, soaring temperatures, and the emotional reward of crossing the finish line after days of adventure through one of Turkey’s most remarkable landscapes.

Stage 3 saw all remaining participants tackle 25km with 732m of elevation gain, a fitting finale to a race that has tested endurance, resilience and determination from start to finish.

The day began with a moment that few runners will ever forget. As dawn broke over the bivouac, the Cappadocian sky filled with dozens of hot-air balloons. Floating silently above the camp, some drifted remarkably close to the runners, creating an unforgettable atmosphere before the start. It was a scene that perfectly captured the magic of Cappadocia, where natural beauty and human adventure combine in extraordinary ways.

While the early morning offered relatively cool running conditions, relief was short-lived. As the sun climbed higher, temperatures quickly rose and another hot day unfolded across the rugged Turkish landscape. The opening kilometres featured an early mountain pass that immediately challenged tired legs before runners descended into a series of valleys, where flowing trails offered opportunities to find rhythm despite the growing heat.

With two checkpoints providing vital support along the route, competitors pushed onward through a course that showcased the very best of Cappadocia’s unique terrain. The final kilometres delivered one last gift: the spectacular Love Valley. Surrounded by the region’s famous rock formations and dramatic scenery, runners experienced a fitting conclusion to an unforgettable journey.

At the front of the race, Sergio Turull produced a powerful performance to claim the men’s stage victory in 2:13:41, while Maryon Pennec continued her exceptional race with another commanding win, crossing the line in 2:52:31.

Selim Deterpigny emerged victorious in the men’s MDS 120 competition with a cumulative time of 11:21:21, while Maryon Pennec claimed the women’s title in 13:15:53 after three days of consistent and impressive running.

In the MDS 100 category, Julie Lafaille topped the women’s podium in 11:50:30, while Patrick Paraire secured victory in the men’s race with a time of 11:20:05.

The MDS 70 category saw Ana Turull take the women’s title in 8:33:42, while Fatih Topçu claimed victory in the men’s competition with a time of 7:54:29.

Yet beyond the podium places and finishing times, MDS Cappadocia is about something deeper. It is about overcoming moments of doubt during long climbs, managing the relentless heat, sharing experiences with fellow runners, and discovering what is possible when mind and body work together toward a common goal.

Over three unforgettable stages, competitors crossed mountain passes, navigated valleys sculpted by time, and ran through one of the world’s most iconic landscapes. They experienced highs and lows, moments of struggle and moments of exhilaration. Every finisher earned not only a medal but also memories that will last a lifetime.

As runners crossed the final finish line and received their hard-earned medals, there was a shared sense of achievement throughout the bivouac. The challenge was complete. The journey through Cappadocia’s extraordinary terrain had come to an end.

The balloons may have drifted away, but the memories of MDS Cappadocia 2026 will remain, etched as deeply as the valleys and rock formations that made this race such a spectacular adventure.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

MDS 120 Cappadocia 2026 – Stage 2

Posted on June 17, 2026 by talkultra

Stage 2 Delivers Heat, Balloons and Cappadocia’s Finest Trails at the Third Edition of MDS Cappadocia

Stage 2 of the third edition of MDS 120 Cappadocia delivered everything that makes this race so special: breathtaking scenery, challenging terrain, soaring temperatures, and the unforgettable spectacle of hot air balloons drifting across the dawn sky.

Today was the stage where runners chose their challenge, with distances of 19.2km, 38.7km or 55.2km on offer. For those tackling the longest route, it was a full and immersive journey through some of Cappadocia’s most spectacular landscapes, passing through the Zemi Valley, Balkan Valley, Gomeda Valley, Rose Valley and finally the Meskendir Valley.

The day began with one of Cappadocia’s most iconic sights. As runners gathered for the early 05:30 start, hundreds of hot air balloons filled the sky, creating a magical backdrop as competitors set off into the cool morning air.

That relief was short-lived.

As the sun climbed higher, temperatures rose rapidly, bringing intense heat that would challenge every participant regardless of distance. The combination of exposed terrain and very little shade made for a demanding day in one of Turkeys most unique environments.

The stage offered constant variety. Runners navigated flowing single-track trails, hidden paths, ancient tunnels and the world-famous fairy chimneys that have made Cappadocia a globally recognised destination. Every valley revealed new scenery, but the relentless heat ensured that nobody had an easy day.

In the MDS120 category, Sélim Deterpigny produced an outstanding performance, appearing to thrive in the demanding conditions. He crossed the finish line in 6:35:07 after a dominant display. Sergio Turull, who had impressed during Stage 1, found the heat more difficult and finished 21 minutes behind. In the women’s race, Maryon Pennec once again demonstrated her strength, taking victory in 7:25:47, just 20 seconds ahead of Lucie Scherrer after a closely contested battle.

The MDS100 category saw victories for Julie Lafaille and Patrick Paraire, who completed the stage in 5:26:59 and 5:07:54 respectively.

In the MDS70 race, Fatih Topçu delighted local supporters with victory in 2:13:47, while Ana Turull claimed the women’s win in 2:20:12.

With Stage 2 complete, runners now look forward to a well-earned rest day. The opportunity to recover, refuel and recharge will be welcomed by everyone after a demanding day under the Turkish sun.

Despite the fatigue, the atmosphere in camp remains exceptionally high. Surrounded by extraordinary landscapes and the daily spectacle of hot air balloons overhead, competitors continue to appreciate just how fortunate they are to be racing in one of the world’s most remarkable locations.

Tomorrow, attention turns to the final stage, a distance that will be run by all participants.

And waiting on the horizon is one of Cappadocia’s most famous landmarks of all: Love Valley.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

MDS 120 Cappadocia 2026 – Stage 1

Posted on June 15, 2026 by talkultra

Stage 1 of the 3rd Edition of MDS Cappadocia delivered everything that makes this race so special.

After several days of heavy rain, participants were greeted by blue skies, sunshine and rising temperatures as they gathered on the start line at 08:00 to experience the magic of one of Turkey’s most extraordinary landscapes.

The opening stage covered 25km with 747m of elevation gain and two checkpoints. While the weather had improved dramatically, the recent rain left sections of the course muddy and demanding, adding another layer of challenge to an already testing route.

The undulating course wound through the heart of Cappadocia, taking runners across open plateaus, along flowing single-track trails and beneath dramatic mountain vistas before passing through the iconic Rose Valley and arriving at the bivouac.

Throughout the day, competitors were immersed in a landscape unlike anywhere else on Earth, where ancient rock formations, vast horizons and centuries of history create an unforgettable backdrop for adventure.

All 400 participants were tested by the terrain, with an impressive 64% of the field made up of women. The diversity of the event was equally remarkable, with the youngest competitor aged 19 and the oldest 74, showcasing the universal appeal of the MDS spirit.

At the front of the race, Sergio Turull, winner of the MDS Ultra 100km in January, stamped his authority on the competition, dominating Stage 1 to claim victory in 2:24:45.

In the women’s race, Maryon Pennec delivered a commanding performance, crossing the finish line in 2:57:35, more than eight minutes ahead of her nearest rival.

Tomorrow, the challenge continues with Stage 2, where competitors will choose between 19.2km, 38.7km or 55.2km routes. By the end of the event, participants will have completed total race distances of 70km, 100km or 120km respectively.

A spectacular start to the week in Cappadocia, where world-class trail running meets one of the most breathtaking landscapes on the planet.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

OMM Ultra Shoe Review

Posted on June 13, 2026 by talkultra

OMM Ultra Shoe Review: A Dependable Long-Distance Companion

The trail running shoe market is crowded. Every brand seems to be chasing super foams, carbon plates, outrageous rocker profiles, and increasingly bold claims about speed and performance. Against that backdrop, OMM enter the shoe market with three new shoes – Ultra, Trail and Fell.

Who are OMM? Read an introduction HERE.

First up, the OMM Ultra. They don’t arrive shouting for attention. They aren’t flashy and they do not promise to transform you into a podium-finishing mountain goat. OMM Ultra gets on with the job it was designed to do: keeping you comfortable, protected, and moving efficiently when the miles start stacking up and fatigue begins to creep in.

A Shoe Designed for the Long Haul

The Ultra is OMM’s most cushioned shoe in their new three shoe offering. Weighing in at 265g for UK8, my UK10 tipped the scales at 336g – with a substantial 30mm heel stack, 22mm forefoot stack, and an 8mm drop, they sit firmly in the category of long-distance comfort cruiser.

From the moment you pick it up, it’s clear what OMM was aiming for. This isn’t a race-day weapon. It’s a shoe built for long training runs, all-day adventures, ultra-distance running, and those occasions when your priority is simply staying comfortable for hour after hour.

As OMM themselves explain, the goal was to create a shoe that “keeps working deep into longer efforts, where comfort and durability become ever more important.”

Two Widths – A Brilliant Decision

One of the smartest decisions OMM made with the Ultra is offering the shoe in two widths – regular and regular+.

It’s a surprisingly simple feature that many brands still overlook, yet it can make the difference between a shoe becoming a favourite or gathering dust on a shelf.

I tested the regular width version and was pleasantly surprised by the amount of room available in the forefoot. There was enough space for natural toe splay without feeling sloppy or oversized.

For runners blessed, or cursed, with what could politely be described as Hobbit feet – the wider Regular+ option is likely to be a huge selling point.

This is one of those consumer-focused decisions that demonstrates genuine thoughtfulness in the design process. Not every foot is built the same, and OMM deserves credit for recognizing that.

First Impressions and Fit

Sizing feels true to size overall.

However, my first run revealed one small issue. About a kilometer into the outing I found myself stopping to adjust the lacing. I was experiencing heel lift when running on the flat.

Now, I should admit that I am notoriously fussy about shoe fit. I like a locked-down, secure feeling. I want the shoe attached to my foot, not accompanying it.

Fortunately, the solution was simple. A quick switch to lock lacing immediately solved the problem and transformed the fit. But the tongue is very thin, arguably too thin, and this can allow some pressure pain when lock laced. OMM’s X-Lacing system, holds the foot, designed to distribute tension across the foot more evenly and is supposed to reduce pressure points during longer runs. However, I found the longer I ran, this became an issue – pressure started to increase, so, you definitely need a few runs to find how tight to lace this area. I found initially, I overtightened my laces and began to feel pressure. Once I adjusted the tension, the fit settled nicely and remained comfortable. Interestingly, underneath the 4 blue eyelets of the X are conventional eyelet holes – so I assume you can lace this way as an option?

Comfort Without the Marshmallow Effect

Perhaps my favourite aspect of the Ultra is its cushioning.

Modern trail shoes often seem to fall into one of two camps. They are either rock hard and unforgiving or so soft that every step feels like running through wet sponge cake.

Neither appeals to me.

The OMM Ultra lands beautifully in the middle.

The thick EVA midsole provides plenty of protection and comfort without becoming overly soft or unstable. Ground feel is surprisingly good for a cushioned shoe. They offer enough cushioning to absorb the cumulative impact of long hours on your feet while still retaining a responsive feel.

There is also a pleasant level of energy return in the propulsive phase. The shoe never feels particularly fast, or nimble, but there is a noticeable forward roll and a gentle kick that encourages momentum. There is no rock-plate and I think this is a mistake.

Built Like a Tank

Protection is another area where the Ultra shines.

The combination of a durable two-layer upper, reinforced TPU protection zones, substantial cushioning, and a secure platform creates what can only be described as a bulletproof feeling underfoot.

Your feet feel protected from uneven ground, trail debris, and the general punishment that comes with spending long days in the mountains.

The toe protection is particularly reassuring without becoming bulky or intrusive.

During testing, I moved across gravel roads, flowing single-track, rocky paths, rutted trails, and mountain terrain. Throughout all of it, the Ultra maintained its composed and reassuring character.

This is not a delicate shoe, on the contrary, they feel like a shoe designed to survive abuse. Given OMM’s heritage in mountain running and adventure racing, that doesn’t come as a surprise.

The Vibram Package

The outsole incorporates three Vibram technologies:

Vibram MegaGrip for traction
Vibram Traction Lugs for increased surface contact
Vibram Litebase for reduced weight

READ ABOUT SHOE GRIP HERE

The outsole uses 4mm lugs, placing it firmly in the versatile all-rounder category. This is not a mud specialist. Nor is it intended to be.

The tread pattern works particularly well on gravel, dry trails, mixed terrain, and even road sections. Transitions between surfaces feel smooth and natural.

For runners who regularly combine road, gravel, trail, and mountain terrain in a single outing, this versatility is a genuine strength.

Predictably, however, the limitations of a 4mm lug become apparent once conditions become truly muddy. Deep mud demands deeper studs, and there is only so much any 4mm lug can do.

That isn’t a criticism; it’s simply physics.

After all, OMM offers the Fell Shoe with aggressive 8mm lugs for exactly those conditions.

Where Things Get Complicated

Sadly, for me, the Vibram outsole was always going to be a contentious point and I had wondered had OMM liaised with Vibram to come up with something different?

Sadly not.

I am a Brit living in Norway. Before moving, much of my running took place in Wales, the Lake District, Scotland, and countless other wonderfully wet corners of the UK. I now have those conditions in Norway.

In those environments, one question always dominated my shoe choice:

How does my shoe grip when everything is wet?

Dry grip is easy.

Wet grip is where great trail shoes separate themselves from merely good ones.

On dry terrain, the Ultra performs exactly as expected. Grip is dependable and confidence-inspiring. On dry mountain trails, gravel tracks, and hard-packed paths, the Vibram outsole performs admirably.

However, once wet rock, slick roots, polished stone, or greasy trail surfaces enter the equation, confidence fades very, very quickly.

The grip isn’t terrible, but it’s not good.

For a brand with such strong mountain credentials, this feels like a missed opportunity for OMM. I had hoped for something very special.

If, your playground involves rain-soaked British mountains or constantly damp Scandinavian forests – you will find yourself wishing for more reassurance and confidence underfoot.

But, If your adventures primarily involve the dry trails and single-track, you’ll likely be delighted. In those conditions, the Ultra makes perfect sense.

The Family Saloon of Trail Running

Throughout testing, I kept returning to one comparison. The OMM Ultra is the trail running equivalent of a dependable family saloon car.

It isn’t flashy.

It won’t win fast races.

It isn’t designed to set lap records.

But it starts every morning, carries everything you need, remains comfortable all day, and quietly does its job exceptionally well.

That’s the Ultra – dependable, reliable, comfortable and maybe even a little mundane.

Final Thoughts

The OMM Ultra may not be the most exciting shoe of the year, but for many it will be an extremely sensible choice.

Thoughtful fit options, balanced cushioning, secure platform, excellent protection, and apparent durability combine to create a highly versatile package that will appeal to a broad range of runners over many varied surfaces.

Road, gravel, trail, mountains – this shoe handles all of them with confidence and comfort. Its biggest strength is consistency. They never feel spectacular, but they are trustworthy and reliable.

The caveat remains the wet-weather grip – especially on wet rock and tree roots. For some runners and locations, that may be a deal breaker. For others, it will simply be a compromise accepted in exchange for the shoe’s impressive versatility.

The heel area is an issue, lock-lacing helps but the tongue needs more padding to ensure 100% comfort. X-lacing requires tweaking and playing around with to find the right tension – but once you find it, it works well.

Overall, the OMM Ultra succeeds in what it set out to achieve – comfortable, durable, a long-distance trail shoe designed to keep performing as fatigue builds and the hours accumulate. For many, if you can only have one pair of shoes – the OMM Ultra would not be a bad choice.

Competition:

This area of the shoe market is one where choice is everywhere, especially with a Vibram Megagrip outsole. If Vibram is your thing, the Hoka Speedgoat and Mafate 5 are worth a look. Also the Nnormal Tomir which is very popular.

La Sportiva make the Prodigio Pro with it’s own outsole – a bouncy and comfy ride.

Icebug make Jarv with the RB9X outsole.

Asics make the Trabuco Max with their own outsole.

Ultimately, the VJ Ultra 3 would be my choice – great foot hold, great comfort with their new cushioning and the outsole is superb – the best there is.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

Running Shoe Grip: Why “Good Grip” Is Far More Complicated Than Most People Think

Posted on June 10, 2026 by talkultra

“The grip is excellent.” One of the most common phrases used in running shoe reviews.

But excellent where?

On dry forest trails? Wet rocks? Muddy hillsides? Gravel tracks? Mountain ridges? Roads?

The reality is that grip is one of the most misunderstood aspects of running shoes. Much like tyres on a Formula 1 car, the best outsoles are often designed to excel in very specific conditions. The more specialised the outsole, the better it tends to perform in its intended environment. The challenge comes when runners expect one shoe to perform equally well everywhere.

The Formula 1 Tyre Comparison

Formula 1 teams do not use one tyre for every condition. They have slick tyres for dry weather, intermediate tyres for damp conditions and wet tyres for heavy rain. Each tyre is designed with a specific purpose in mind.

Image copyright Pirelli – a wonderful example of how we should look at run shoe outsoles.

Trail running shoes are no different.

An outsole designed for muddy fell running will almost certainly perform poorly on road sections. Likewise, an outsole designed for mixed road-to-trail use will struggle when faced with steep, wet mountain terrain.

The key point is that grip is always a compromise between different surfaces, conditions and requirements. There is no universal outsole. There are only outsoles that are better suited to certain environments than others.

Grip Is Actually Two Different Things

When runners talk about grip, they are often describing two separate characteristics.

The first is friction.

This is the ability of the rubber compound to adhere to a surface. Friction is what gives confidence on wet rock, slick roots, hard-packed trails and tarmac. It is primarily influenced by the rubber compound itself.

The second is mechanical traction.

This is the ability of the outsole to bite into a surface. Mechanical traction becomes important on mud, loose gravel, soft ground, snow and wet grass. It is primarily influenced by lug design.

Understanding this distinction explains why some shoes perform brilliantly in one environment but poorly in another.

A shoe with soft, sticky rubber may feel exceptional on wet rock but struggle in deep mud if the lugs are too shallow.

Conversely, a mud-specific shoe may offer tremendous traction on a steep hillside while feeling insecure on wet slabs because the rubber compound prioritises penetration into soft ground rather than adhesion to hard surfaces.

When someone says a shoe has “great grip”, it is worth asking whether they mean friction, traction or both.

Rubber Compound: The Foundation of Grip

The first factor that determines how well an outsole performs is the rubber compound itself.

Different brands use different compounds, each balancing grip, durability and performance in varying conditions.

Generally speaking, harder rubber compounds offer:

Greater durability
Better longevity
Increased resistance to wear on road surfaces
Reduced grip on wet rocks, roots and technical terrain

Softer rubber compounds offer:

Superior traction on wet rock
Better adhesion on slick roots
Increased confidence on technical terrain
Reduced lifespan due to faster wear

This trade-off is unavoidable.

A rubber compound that delivers exceptional grip on wet mountain rock is usually sacrificing durability somewhere else.

This is why shoes that feel incredible on technical terrain may show noticeable outsole wear after extensive road use, while harder compounds may last for hundreds of miles but feel less reassuring when conditions become wet and technical.

Lug Design: More Than Just Lug Depth

When discussing grip, many runners focus solely on lug depth.

While lug depth is important, it is only one part of a much larger picture.

The following factors all influence performance:

Lug depth
Lug shape
Lug spacing
Lug orientation
Lug density
Surface area of the lug

A road-to-trail shoe may use lugs around 2-3mm deep. These provide smooth transitions onto tarmac, maintain comfort on hard surfaces and offer sufficient traction on light trails and gravel paths.

A dedicated trail shoe might use 4-5mm lugs, creating a balance between versatility and off-road performance.

Meanwhile, a fell running or mud-specific shoe may feature aggressive 6-8mm lugs designed specifically to penetrate soft ground and provide maximum traction.

However, deeper is not always better.

Large, aggressive lugs can feel unstable on road surfaces, wear more quickly and reduce overall efficiency when running on hard-packed terrain.

Directional Grip: Climbing, Descending and Cornering

Grip is not simply about moving forwards. A good outsole must provide traction in multiple directions.

When climbing, lugs need to generate forward propulsion.
When descending, they need to provide braking traction.
When traversing slopes or cornering, they need to resist lateral movement.

This is where lug orientation becomes particularly important.

Forward-facing lugs often improve climbing traction by helping the shoe bite into the ground.
Rear-facing lugs can improve braking performance on descents.
Side lugs can enhance stability when cornering or running across off-camber terrain.

Two shoes may have similar lug depths but feel completely different on technical trails because of how those lugs are positioned and oriented.

Lug Quantity: When More Isn’t Better

Another overlooked aspect of outsole design is the number of lugs used. At first glance, more lugs might seem like a positive feature. More contact points should equal more grip.

Not necessarily.

A higher number of closely packed lugs can increase surface contact on firmer terrain and improve stability. However, in muddy conditions they can become a disadvantage.

Mud needs somewhere to go.

If lugs are packed too closely together, mud can accumulate between them and effectively create a smooth layer underneath the shoe. Once this happens, traction decreases significantly.

This is why many fell-running shoes feature widely spaced lugs. The larger gaps allow mud to be shed more effectively with each stride, keeping the outsole functioning as intended.

The best mud shoes are often those that clear mud efficiently rather than simply those with the deepest lugs.

Different Surfaces Require Different Types of Grip

One reason grip is so difficult to evaluate is that every surface places different demands on an outsole.

Salomon offer a good example of grip options for specific terrain – see how the road outsole is almost flat whereas the mud outsole is aggressive and spaced out – by contrast, the water outsole has large flat lugs.

Wet Rock

Soft, sticky rubber is often the priority.
Friction and size matters more than lug depth.

Dry Rock

Most modern trail shoes perform reasonably well.
Stability and confidence become more important than outright grip.

Mud

Deep, widely spaced lugs are critical.
Mechanical traction is the dominant factor.

Loose Gravel

Lug penetration and a stable platform help prevent slipping.

Forest Trails

A balanced outsole usually performs best.
Extreme lug depth is rarely necessary.

Road and Hardpack

Surface contact, comfort and durability become increasingly important.
Aggressive mud lugs can feel inefficient and unstable.

Understanding the terrain is often more useful than understanding the shoe.

Specialist Outsoles and Why They Matter

This is where specialist outsole compounds begin to separate themselves from the competition.

Many brands have invested heavily in developing their own proprietary technologies designed for specific environments.

Examples include:

adidas Continental (yes, the tyre compnay)
Scarpa Presa TRN series
Inov-8 Graphene/ STICKYGRIP and TRI-C
VJ Sport Superior Contact Butyl Rubber
La Sportiva FriXion – whites/red/blue/black and eco
Salomon Contagrip – road, all terrain, mud, winter and water

Some compounds prioritise wet-rock adhesion. Others focus on durability. Others seek a balance between the two.

Perhaps the best example is VJ Sport’s Butyl rubber. Among experienced mountain runners and orienteers, it has developed an outstanding reputation for wet-rock performance. In challenging mountain environments where confidence on slick surfaces is critical, specialised compounds such as this can provide a genuine advantage.

The key point is that these outsoles are often designed with a very specific purpose in mind rather than trying to satisfy every possible use case.

Outsole Flexibility and Ground Contact

Another often overlooked factor is how effectively a shoe maintains contact with the ground. Even the most aggressive outsole can only generate traction if it is actually in contact with the surface beneath it.

On uneven trails, rocky terrain and technical mountain ground, some shoes are able to conform more effectively to irregular surfaces, allowing more of the outsole to engage with the terrain.

OMM Wave Geometry increases surface contact area with irregular ground.

However, flexibility is not always the answer.

A stiffer shoe may provide greater precision, protection and confidence on rocky terrain. Many mountain-running and approach-style shoes deliberately use stiffer platforms because they allow runners to edge more effectively on uneven surfaces.

Ultimately, grip improves when the shoe maintains effective contact with the terrain, whether through flexibility, torsional compliance or structural stability.

As with every aspect of outsole design, the optimal balance depends on the environment for which the shoe was intended.

The Rise of Vibram Megagrip

In recent years, one outsole has become increasingly dominant across the industry: Vibram Megagrip.

There is no doubt that Megagrip is an excellent compound. It offers an impressive balance of durability, traction and all-round performance with a pay-off on grip in wet rock conditions. It has become the default choice for many premium trail shoes for good reason.

However, the presence of Megagrip alone does not guarantee exceptional grip. Two shoes may use exactly the same rubber compound yet perform very differently in the real world.

Lug geometry, lug spacing, outsole layout, shoe flexibility and overall design remain hugely important.

As more brands adopt the same compound, the differences between shoes increasingly come down to how that compound is implemented rather than the compound itself.

Megagrip remains one of the most versatile options available, but it is only one piece of the overall grip equation.

Why “Good Grip” Depends Entirely on Where You Run

Consider two runners.

The first runs exclusively on dry woodland trails, gravel tracks and flowing singletrack.

For this runner, almost any modern trail shoe with a standard rubber compound and moderate lugs may provide perfectly adequate grip. They may genuinely believe their shoe offers excellent traction because it performs well in their environment.

The second runner starts on roads, moves onto forest trails, then climbs into steep mountain terrain featuring wet rocks, exposed roots and slippery technical sections.

Suddenly, grip becomes a much more demanding requirement.

What felt excellent in dry woodland conditions may feel completely inadequate when the terrain becomes steep, wet and technical.

This is why context matters.

A shoe that provides outstanding grip in one environment may be average in another.

The Search for the Perfect Outsole

The uncomfortable truth is that there is no perfect outsole.

The best grip comes when a runner can be highly specific about their needs and select a shoe built for those exact conditions.

If your running consists primarily of muddy fell races, choose a mud-specific outsole.
If your focus is technical mountain running, prioritise compounds that excel on wet rock.
If your routes combine road, gravel and moderate trails, a less aggressive and more versatile outsole may be the better solution.

The closer the outsole is matched to its intended environment, the better it will perform.

Conclusion

Grip is not a simple yes-or-no characteristic.

It is a complex interaction between rubber compound, friction, traction, lug design, lug spacing, lug depth, terrain, weather and running style.

The most specialised outsoles often provide the highest levels of performance, but only within the conditions they were designed for. Like Formula 1 tyres, they excel when used exactly as intended.

The more a shoe attempts to become a “jack of all trades”, the more compromises inevitably appear.

That said, budget must also be considered.

Running shoes have become increasingly expensive, and for many runners owning multiple pairs for different conditions is simply unrealistic. In these cases, the search for a versatile “one shoe does all” option is entirely sensible.

While such shoes may never be the absolute best in every environment, they often represent the most practical and economical choice.

Ultimately, the question is not whether a shoe has good grip.

The question is whether it has the right grip for the terrain you’re asking it to handle.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

VJ FZN Aerofly Review – The Ultimate Door-to-Trail Companion?

Posted on June 8, 2026 by talkultra

For decades, VJ Sport has built its reputation around one thing: grip. Born in the forests of Finland and forged through the demanding world of orienteering, the brand has become synonymous with shoes capable of handling some of the toughest and slipperiest terrain imaginable. With the FZN Aerofly, however, VJ takes a slightly different approach, entering the rapidly growing “door-to-trail” category with a shoe designed to seamlessly connect road, gravel, and trail running.

First Impressions

The Aerofly immediately brings back memories of the VJ Ultra 3, but it also feels surprisingly similar to a road-running shoe. The design philosophy is clear from the first run: create a highly comfortable, versatile shoe that performs equally well on asphalt, gravel roads, hard-packed trails, and mixed-surface adventures.

The upper features VJ’s Multizone Engineered Mesh, delivering excellent breathability while maintaining a secure and supportive fit. Combined with the brand’s proven Fitlock system,

The shoe wraps confidently around the midfoot, providing stability without feeling restrictive. I have siad this many times before, and I will say it again, Fitlock really does give the best foothold!

The heel is well cushioned and supportive, contributing significantly to the shoe’s long-distance comfort and there are no irritation points – early MAXx2 and Ultra 3 had this.

The toe box is generously sized, allowing the toes to spread naturally during longer runs, while reinforced protection around the front of the shoe guards against accidental encounters with rocks and roots.

Ride and Performance

VJ’s SuperFOAMance™ midsole – a nitrogen-infused foam delivers a highly cushioned yet energetic ride that feels remarkably smooth and lively underfoot. This has appeared in the MAXx2 and the Ultra 3 and it has been a game changer.

Aerofly isn’t designed as a race-day weapon or interval specialist, that role belongs to the more performance-focused sister shoe, the VJ Fuzion Tempo. However, despite its comfort-oriented design, the Aerofly never feels sluggish, the opposite. The foam provides excellent energy return, making it enjoyable on everything from easy recovery runs to steady long-distance efforts – even great when walking!

Enough softness to absorb impact during long runs and still responsiveness to keep transitions smooth and efficient. It could easily be a road shoe.

Rock Plate Done Right

Beneath the SuperFOAMance layer sits a full-length rock plate, a feature typically reserved for more rugged trail shoes.

Its implementation here is particularly effective because it achieves three important goals:

Protects the foot from sharp stones and trail debris
Improves stability by reducing excessive midfoot torsion
Creates smoother transitions across uneven surfaces

VJ has integrated the plate in a way that complements the soft midsole, unlike some rock plates that make a shoe feel stiff or harsh, protection without sacrificing flexibility or comfort.

Outsole and Grip

VJ’s legendary reputation is built largely on its Superior Contact outsole and butyl rubber compound, often regarded as among the best trail-running grips available.

Instead of butyl rubber, VJ uses a lighter and significantly more durable Lightrubber outsole with dense 3 mm lugs. This choice reflects the shoe’s hybrid nature and while the outsole performs very well on asphalt, gravel, hard-packed trails, grass, and dry terrain the compromise becomes noticeable in wet and highly technical conditions.

During mixed-surface adventures, the Aerofly feels confident and predictable, on slick rocks and wet technical trail, the grip is not what one would expect from a typical VJ shoe – they feel much more like a Vibram.

Real-World Versatility

Whether running on city pavement, gravel roads, sandy beaches, forest paths, or moderate technical trails, the shoe feels at home. It excels in exactly the type of running many athletes actually do on a daily basis – start from the front door, covering a few kilometers of road, transitioning onto gravel or forest trails, and returning home via pavement. For runners living in urban environments who need to connect road miles with trail miles, the Aerofly may be one of the most practical options in VJ’s lineup.

Aerofly prioritizes comfort, cushioning, and versatility over outright technical performance.

Specifications

Weight: 256 g (EU 42)
Stack Height: 38 mm / 30 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Lug Depth: 3 mm

Pros

Highly breathable upper
Excellent midfoot lockdown
Nitrogen-infused SuperFOAMance™ midsole
Strong energy return
Full-length rock plate
Stable platform
Lightweight construction
Secure fit with gusseted tongue
Removable insole
Outstanding versatility across mixed terrain

Cons

Grip falls short of VJ’s best trail-specific outsoles
Less confidence on wet rocks and slippery technical terrain

Verdict

The VJ FZN Aerofly successfully bridges the gap between road and trail running. It combines road-shoe comfort with trail-shoe protection, creating a highly versatile package that excels on mixed terrain.

While it won’t replace a dedicated mountain or technical trail shoe, that’s not its purpose. Instead, the Aerofly delivers exceptional comfort, reliable protection, and enough traction to tackle most surfaces runners encounter in everyday training.

Outside of very technical and wet terrain, the Aerofly comes across as a highly versatile, comfort-focused hybrid that stays true to VJ’s performance heritage while appealing to a much broader audience of runners.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

Who Really Powers Mountain, Ultra and Trail Running? The Volunteer Question.

Posted on June 7, 2026 by talkultra

Trail running has always been built on community. Volunteers stand at the heart of the sport, helping races function while creating the atmosphere that makes them special. But as many events have grown into large commercial enterprises, an uncomfortable question emerges: when a race generates significant revenue, should it still rely on unpaid labour? I’m not sure there is a simple answer. The reality sits somewhere between community spirit and business economics, and that’s what makes the debate worth having.

Trail and ultra running likes to present itself as a community before it presents itself as a business. That distinction matters, because the entire volunteer model in mountain racing depends on it.

Volunteering at races is noble and organic: people giving back to a sport they love. Aid stations staffed by local clubs, marshals standing in freezing rain at 3am, finish-line crews catching exhausted runners after 100 miles. The imagery is powerful. It reinforces the idea that trail running is somehow different from mainstream commercial sport.

But modern trail racing, – especially at the highest level – is no longer purely community-driven. Many major events are highly profitable commercial enterprises with corporate sponsors, media deals, merchandise, qualification systems, tourism partnerships and global brand expansion.

And that raises an uncomfortable question: If races are businesses, why are so many of the workers unpaid?

Take Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc as the clearest example. UTMB is no longer simply a mountain race organised by local enthusiasts. It is a global endurance brand. UTMB race week, the organization requires approximately 2,000 to 2,500 volunteers to ensure the successful operation of the event. In addition, there are UTMB World Series races across continents, partnerships with major corporations, streaming productions, premium entry fees, lotteries, travel packages and extensive merchandising. The infrastructure resembles a professional sporting enterprise. UTMB generate an estimated €30 million in revenue!

Yet the operational backbone of the event still depends heavily on volunteers. Without them, many races simply would not function financially.

That is the core reality that the sport rarely confronts directly.

A large ultra race requires enormous manpower: registration, bib collection, checkpoints, course marking, sweeping, medical support coordination, parking, logistics, finish-line support, drop bag management, transport and clean-up. Paying market wages for every role would radically alter race economics. Entry fees would rise sharply or profit margins would shrink.

Volunteers effectively subsidise the event.

The interesting part is not that volunteers exist. Volunteers are everywhere in society. The interesting part is that volunteering remains culturally unquestioned even when races become commercially sophisticated businesses.

In most industries, this model would feel absurd.

Imagine a privately owned bank. The owner hires executives, accountants and security staff, but then asks enthusiasts of banking to work unpaid at the cash desks because they “love finance” and want to “be part of the atmosphere.” Society would reject that instantly. The same would apply to airlines, supermarkets or hotels. Once an operation becomes commercial, labour is expected to be compensated.

So why do races escape?

Partly because sport occupies a strange middle ground between commerce and culture.

People volunteer at races not purely as workers but as participants in an identity. They often feel emotionally invested in the event, the region, the community or the sport itself. Volunteering becomes social capital. It offers belonging, prestige, access and meaning. In trail running especially, there is a strong ethic of reciprocity: “someone helped me, so I should help others.”

Key points are to support the outdoor community, maybe secure a guaranteed entry into future event, and enjoy the social atmosphere.

Volunteers, typically, are ultrarunners or hikers themselves, they want to support their friends, community, cheer, and pay forward the help they received during their own races.
Volunteers can earn discounted entries, priority for future events or a bonus compensation on apparel/ merchandise.
There is a huge social benefit, friendship and community.
Free t-shirts, hat, and/ot other merchandise and more often than not, free food and drink

Eiger Ultra Trail by UTMB (as an example) clearly state the offer via their website:

A successful Eiger Ultra Trail event relies heavily on the help of volunteers. Volunteers have the unique opportunity to actively participate in this international event, to experience the race up close as it unfolds and to be on-hand for support when 4000 competitors from 80 nations attempt to conquer the 101km, 250km, 51km, 35km, 16km or Trail Surprise at the foot of the Eiger.

We offer our Volunteers:

An unforgettable experience in a breathtaking mountain landscape
An attractive Volunteer Shirt (male and female fit available)
Free gondola or train ride from Grindelwald to the race courses
Refreshments during volunteer service (lunchbag, hot meals from Friday)
Free accommodation at youth hostel (shared room) if volunteering early morning or late evening and if the assignment cannot be reached in time by public transport.
Personal expenses of CHF 30.00 per Person, or CHF 60.00 from 20h service
Volunteer gift

If you are supporter of a competitor and volunteering for us you get a free transport ticket to the race courses.We’re happy to welcome volunteers from the age of 13 – 70. A good physical condition is necessary.

Race organisations understand this extremely well.

The language surrounding volunteers is carefully framed around family, passion and community spirit. Volunteers are celebrated publicly, thanked emotionally and woven into the mythology of the sport. This is genuine – many volunteers truly enjoy the experience – but it also masks an economic truth: their labour has real financial value.

That value is substantial.

A major ultra may require hundreds, if not thousands of volunteer hours. If those hours were compensated at standard labour rates, the event budget would look entirely different. Volunteers are not merely helping. They are replacing paid staffing costs.

Other sectors do use unpaid labour, but usually with controversy attached.

Media companies rely on unpaid internships. Fashion and film industries often offer people to work “for exposure.” Tech startups use open-source contributors whose free work later supports billion-dollar valuations. Universities depend heavily on unpaid academic labour. Charities and grassroots sports clubs naturally rely on volunteers because they are non-profit or resource-constrained.

The key distinction is this: society tends to become more critical when unpaid labour supports private profit rather than public benefit.

That is where trail running becomes ethically complicated.

A local village race organised by a community association is one thing. Few participants object to volunteers there because the event itself may barely break even and any surplus returns to local causes.

A global race brand charging premium prices while still depending on unpaid operational labour is different.

And yet it remains normalised because trail running inherited its culture from grassroots mountain events long before the sport commercialised. The volunteer ethos survived the transition from community gathering to international business model.

There is also a practical reality: many races genuinely could not exist in their current form if every role became salaried. Mountain races are logistically extreme. Remote terrain, long durations and unpredictable weather create staffing demands unlike those of conventional road races or stadium sports. The economics are difficult even before considering environmental permits, safety systems, insurance and medical infrastructure.

And this brings in the point of paid staff. The primary organizers, logistics leads, and business owners who plan the event year-round are paid along with specialized crews such as media, medical teams, mountain safety, technical contractors and so on.

At some point, the question becomes philosophical rather than logistical: When does a community event become a corporation wearing community clothing?

The discomfort around this subject often comes from the fact that both realities coexist simultaneously. Trail races are still authentic communal experiences for many people. Volunteers often derive real satisfaction and pride from contributing. The emotional value is genuine.

Yet it is also true that this culture enables profitable enterprises to operate with labour models that would appear unacceptable almost anywhere else.

The sport rarely interrogates that contradiction because everyone benefits in some way. Runners get lower fees than fully commercial staffing would require. Volunteers gain belonging and access. Race brands preserve their community image while controlling costs.

The arrangement works.

Until someone asks whether it should.

What are your thoughts on the volunteer model? Do you foresee a change in the future – not at the grass-roots, non-profitable level – but are the larger, corporate and very obvious businesses level where profit and high profits are very visible.

Whether this model can survive unchanged at the corporate end of the sport remains to be seen. I do not know the answer, but it is a question we should not stop asking.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com

OMM (Original Mountain Marathon) release FELL, TRAIL and ULTRA Shoes

Posted on June 5, 2026 by talkultra

OMM (Original Mountain Marathon) is a British mountain running and outdoor brand with roots dating back to 1968, when the original two-day mountain marathon race was established in the UK’s rugged uplands. Designed around the demands of self-sufficient mountain racing, OMM built its reputation on ultralight, highly protective equipment engineered for harsh weather and long distances. Since becoming an independent brand in 2004, OMM has developed a loyal following among fell runners, trail runners, ultramarathon athletes and fast-packers, and is particularly well known for its lightweight packs, technical waterproof apparel and innovative fabrics such as Kamleika and PointZero. While the brand enjoys near-cult status in the UK and strong popularity in markets including Japan, Scandinavia and parts of Europe, it remains a specialist name globally, prized by mountain athletes who prioritise performance, durability and minimal weight.

The Opportunity

On paper, footwear feels like a natural extension for OMM. The brand was born from mountain racing and has spent decades designing equipment for runners tackling some of the harshest terrain and weather in the world. That heritage gives OMM credibility that many newer running brands can only aspire to. By launching a three-shoe range covering Fell, Trail and Ultra, OMM is creating a more complete ecosystem for its core audience, allowing runners to pair footwear with the packs, apparel and waterproofs the brand is already known for. At a time when many trail shoes are becoming increasingly cushioned and generalized, OMM also has an opportunity to differentiate itself with products that reflect its roots in technical mountain running, lightweight performance and all-weather reliability.

The Challenge

The downside is that OMM is entering one of the most crowded and competitive categories in outdoor sports. Trail running footwear is dominated by established specialists such as Salomon, La Sportiva, Hoka, while brands such as NNormal, Altra and Scarpa continue to fight for market share. Unlike packs or waterproof jackets, where OMM already has a strong reputation, footwear requires years of biomechanical expertise, athlete testing and consumer trust.

Among fell runners and mountain athletes, the most direct comparisons are likely to be drawn with inov-8 and VJ Sport – two brands that have spent decades refining footwear specifically for steep, technical and often wet terrain. inov-8 has long been synonymous with British fell running, while VJ has earned an almost cult-like reputation for its outsole technology, widely regarded as one of the benchmarks for grip on wet rock, slick roots and muddy mountain trails. For OMM, entering footwear means competing not only against established global brands, but against niche specialists whose credibility has been built shoe by shoe over many years. Given OMM’s own heritage in mountain racing, expectations will be high, and serious runners will inevitably judge the new Fell, Trail and Ultra models against the traction, precision and durability standards already set by Inov-8 and especially VJ – notably, both who have their own outsole!

FELL – 8mm lugs – 4mm drop –19.5/23.5 cushioning

TRAIL – 4mm lugs – 6mm drop – 21/27 cushioning

ULTRA – 4mm lugs – 8mm drop – 22/30 cushioning

One potential weakness of OMM’s footwear strategy is its decision to rely on Vibram outsoles rather than developing a proprietary rubber compound and tread system. While Vibram is one of the most respected names in mountain footwear and appears on countless premium trail and hiking shoes, it is not unique to OMM. In contrast, both Inov-8 and VJ have invested heavily in developing their own outsole technologies, giving them a clear point of distinction in a highly competitive market. For VJ in particular, exceptional grip on wet rock has become a defining part of the brand’s identity #bestgripontheplanet – while inov-8’s outsole designs are closely associated with British fell running and soft-ground performance.

This raises an obvious question for OMM: why should a runner choose an OMM shoe if the outsole technology is essentially shared with dozens of competing brands? For a niche company entering an already crowded category, proprietary technology can be a powerful way to stand out and build long-term loyalty. By opting for Vibram, OMM gains instant credibility and proven performance, but potentially sacrifices a degree of uniqueness. Ultimately, the success of the Fell, Trail and Ultra models may depend on whether runners see the overall package – fit, ride, upper design and mountain-running heritage as compelling enough to outweigh the lack of a distinctive outsole story.

More to the Vibram story

However, there is more to this story… OMM use a sole unit that is unique to the OMM shoe. Vibram, along with athlete Gediminas Grinius, developed over 1000’s of km’s a sole unit – cushioning and outsole – designed to be the perfect combination – VIBRAM SOLESYSTEM. Commercially though, it was unviable until OMM saw this and eventually turned the concept to reality. With specifically developed traction lugs, a wave shape, specific descent lugs, contour lugs and a Vibram midsole with MetaFlex – OMM believe they have the USP to stand out.

There is a clear logic to the OMM approach:

*Fell shoe has less cushioning, 19.5-23.5mm and 4mm drop. The Fell shoe comes in a regular fit and whopping 8mm lugs to grip in mud and soft-ground.

*Trail shoe sits in the middle ground with a 6mm drop and 21-27mm cushioning. The Trail and Ultra shoes both have 4mm lugs but come in two widths – regular and regular+

*Ultra shoe has 8mm drop for more comfort over longer distances and more cushioning with 22-30mm. The Ultra shoes both have 4mm lugs but come in two widths – regular and regular+

OMM may well be late to the shoe game but they are covering the bases to ensure that they have a product for all.

The Fell is arguably the most obvious shoe for the typical mountain marathon runner. But, the option of Trail and Ultra acknowledges the ever changing demands and needs of their audience.

Reviews to follow.

Instagram – @iancorlessphotography

Twitter – @talkultra

Web – www.iancorless.com