How Do We Keep Doping Out of Trail Running? by Outside Online

Calisto_OutsideOnline

I have been very vocal lately about the doping scandal around Gonzalo Calisto and his positive test for EPO at the 2015 UTMB. Outside Magazine contacted me and and asked for my input based on my articles and research as listed below.

Post 1 UTMB faces positive EPO test HERE

Post 2 Michel Poletti HERE

Post 3 IAAF HERE

Post 4 Update IAAF and Catherine Poletti HERE

Post 5 Gonzalo Calisto statement HERE

Post 6 ITRA statement HERE

Post 7 DRUGS in Mountain, Ultra and Trail #EPO #UTMB

********

You can now read an article by Meaghen Brown published on Outside Online

Over the past few years, rumors have swirled in ultrarunning circles about how some frequent podium finishers seem so resilient to the endless, hard, mountain miles. But when news broke in mid July that Ecuadorian ultrarunner Gonzalo Calisto had been busted in a positive EPO test and subsequently disqualified from the prestigious Ultra Trail du Mont Blanc, it marked an important turning point for a sport that has thus far maintained a pretty wholesome image.

 

“To be honest, it breaks my heart,” says professional ultrarunner Mike Foote, who’s twice placed in the top five at UTMB. “The ultrarunning community prides itself on a deep we-are-in-this-together mentality, and Calisto being busted for EPO undermines this culture and this mutual respect and celebration of one another.”

You can read the full article online HERE

ITRA release statement on #EPO positive for Gonzalo Calisto

©iancorless.com_TCC2016-1779

This morning I posted the long awaited statement from Gonzalo Calisto after testing positive for EPO at the 2015 UTMB. If you are new to the story, please read the posts below.

Post 1 UTMB faces positive EPO test HERE

Post 2 Michel Poletti HERE

Post 3 IAAF HERE

Post 4 Update IAAF and Catherine Poletti HERE

Post 5 Gonzalo Calisto statement HERE

Today, I have now received a statement and clarification from ITRA into the process that Gonzalo Calisto has gone through:

July 25th 2016

PREAMBLE

On June 29th  2016*, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) published on its web-site in newsletter 174 a list of athletes who had been sanctioned for doping. On this list figures M. Gonzalo CALISTO for a positive test of EPO on August 29th 2015 at the finish of the  UTMB®.

ITRA HEALTH POLICY

The term  «health policy» designates actions which  aim at increasing the prevention and the protection of the health of the sportspersons.

The ITRA, in particular, offers organisers the chance of setting up a preventative action concerning health matters. This action has neither the vocation nor the competence to be a substitute for  current national and/or international regulations regarding the anti-doping fight but has the aim of strengthening the medical supervision within the framework of the health security plan set up by the organisation. This action is led by a Medical Counsel, uniquely made up of doctors, who are able to take advice from experts of their choice and who are charged with giving consultative advice to the Race Jury on the medical state of participants.

More information about the ITRA health policy : http://itra.run/page/261/Politique_sante.html

HISTORY AND CHRONOLOGY OF THE ITRA’S HEALTH POLICY

Within the framework of the health policy set up by the ITRA, M. Gonzalo CALISTO submitted a first blood sample on May 28th 2015 at 13:077 (World Trail-Running Championships in Annecy (France) organised by the IAU in collaboration with the ITRA)

M. Gonzalo CALISTO’s  haematological profile presented several abnormal values which led to the athlete being summoned, on May 29th 2015, before the start of the race, to a meet with the event’s medical commission of 2 doctors and an expert from the Association «Athletes For Transparency» with a more specific responsibility for aspects concerning the anti-doping fight.

The Ecuadorian origin of M. Gonzalo CALISTO, which according to scientific literature, maybe be responsible for specific haematological profiles (Quito, altitude of 2850m), as well as the argument put forward by the athlete of having very regular exposure to very high altitudes  (>5500m) were retained to classify his haematological profile  as  « atypical » (rather than « abnormal ») and so authorised him to take the start of the race for the World trail-Running Championships in Annecy.

The information relating to  M. Gonzalo CALISTO’s  « atypical » profile was transmitted by telephone on May 29th 2015 to an organisation responsible for the anti-doping fight. The two possible options were retained by  the Association «Athletes For Transparency» to explain this « atypical » profile knowing that a specific genetical profile or the taking of EPO were then evoked.

The « atypical » profile of the athlete was once again brought up in a telephone conversation in June 2015 (no precise date) with an organisation responsible for the anti-doping fight.

M. Gonzalo CALISTO submitted a second blood sample on August 27th 2015 at 13:45 before the start of the UTMB® within the framework of the ITRA’s Health policy. His haematological profile once again showed several abnormalities.

With the reason, of the always possible specific genetic profile linked to his Ecuadorian origins, the athlete’s haematological profile was again classed as « atypical » and he was authorised to take the start of the UTMB®.

The ITRA learnt, on August 29th 2015 the urinary anti-doping tests at the finish had been able to specifically target M. Gonzalo CALISTO.

On April 21st 2016 information relating to  M. Gonzalo CALISTO were sent by email to the Association «Athletes For Transparency» by an organisation in charge of the anti-doping fight.

THE ITRA’S MANAGEMENT OF A POSITIVE TEST

The role of the ITRA following a positive test is:

–          To ensure the disqualification of M. Gonzalo CALISTO from events in which he would have been able to participate in during the period of disqualification  (as from August 19th, 2015).

–          To ensure the non-participation in any race which is a member of the ITRA during the period of  M. Gonzalo CALISTO’s period of suspension, from March 17th 2016 to March 17th 2018. (The start of the period of sanction (March 17th 2016) is determined by the “test authority” in relation to the provisional suspension, interviews, appeals made by the athlete, etc….)

Patrick BASSET – President of the ITRA Health Commission

Pierre SALLET – President of the Association Athletes For Transparency

ITRA performance profile – Gonzalo Calisto HERE


ITRAperformanceprofile

******

I would welcome clarification and statements from Gonzalo Callisto’s sponsors, MOVISTAR and COMPRESSPORT. I would welcome clarification from races that Gonzalo Calisto participated in after August 2015 – how will they proceed?

As usual I welcome your thoughts in this story and process

Episode 101 – Mal Law, Jo Meek, Lucja Leonard

A_GRAVATAR

This is Episode 101 of Talk Ultra. We speak with Jo Meek who is back in form after almost a year of injury. Mal Law talks about HIGH FIVE-0 and Lucja Leonard talks all about weight loss in Talk Training. Dare I say it, but the PED debate has started in ultra, trail and mountain running and we discuss what is happening! Speedgoat is here.

00:01:31 Show Start

00:08:30 NEWS

Help Nepal – Nepal images ‘FACES of NEPAL’ – order a print and all funds donated to Nepal charities HERE

TRAINING CAMP in Lanzarote with Elisabet Barnes 28th Jan to Feb 4th HERE

DRUGS, PEDs, EPO are becoming a reality in our sport READ HERE and your thoughts.

 

TNF50

1 – Zach Miller 6:12

2 – Dylan Bowman 6:20

3 – Ryan Bak 6:26

1 – Megan Kimmel 7:13

2 – Ellie Greenwood 7:23

3 – Larisa Dannis 7:25

MSIG LANTAU

1 – Francois D’Haene 5:42

2 – Eirik Haugsness

3 – Upendra Sunuwar

1 – Maud Gobert 7:08

2 – Marie McNaughton

3 – Rebecca Nakuwa

VULCANO ULTRA TRAIL 100k

1 – Cristofer Clemente 12:31 held off Joe Grant for the win

2 – Manuela Vilaseca 15:48 ran away with the ladies race ahead of Veronica Bravo

SAINT E LYON France

Benoit Cori (Templars winner) finished with Nicolas Martin joint 1st 5:07 and Corali Bugnare took out the ladies wins 6:32

HARDROCK 100 entries HERE 

WSER entries HERE

00:55:55 INTERVIEW with JO MEEK HERE

01:37:19 TALK TRAINING this week Lucja Leonard tells us how loosing weight and running changed her life HERE

02:04:09 INTERVIEW with MAL LAW and the HIGH FIVE-0 Challenge HERE

UP & COMING RACES

Australia

New South Wales

Coast to Kosciuszko | 240 kilometers | December 11, 2015 | website

Queensland

Kurrawa to Duranbah and Return – 50 km | 50 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

Narawntapu 50 km | 50 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

Victoria

Duncan’s Run-Hundred | 100 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Duncan’s Run-Hundred – 50 km | 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Belgium

Wallonia

53 km | 53 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Costa Rica

Moonrun Monteverde Ultra Trail | 62 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

French Guiana

100 Bornes du Père Noël | 100 kilometers | December 18, 2015 | website

Germany

Baden-Württemberg

Eisweinlauf | 65 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Lower Saxony

  1. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 100 KM| 100 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website
  2. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 50 KM| 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website
  3. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 100 KM| 100 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website
  4. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 50 KM| 50 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website
  5. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 100 KM| 100 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website
  6. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 50 KM| 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website
  7. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 100 KM| 100 kilometers | December 20, 2015 | website
  8. Lauf PSV Winterlaufserie 50 KM| 50 kilometers | December 20, 2015 | website

India

Haryana

Running And Living – 105.5 km | 105 kilometers | December 14, 2015 | website

Running And Living Marathon and a Half – 63.3km | 63 kilometers | December 14, 2015 | website

Madagascar

Nosy Be Trail – 60 km | 60 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Sweden

Blåfrusen Ultramarathon | 70 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

USA

Arizona

Desert Solstice 100 Mile Run | 100 miles | December 19, 2015 | website

Desert Solstice 50K Run | 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

California

Malibu Canyon Trail Run 50 km | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Rodeo Beach 50 km | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Woodside Ramble 50K | 50 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

Colorado

Sawmill 50K+ | 34 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Florida

50K Ultra Marathon | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Ancient Oaks 100 Mile Race | 100 miles | December 19, 2015 | website

Deer Dodge 50K | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Deer Dodge 50 Miler | 50 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Tallahassee Ultra Distance Classic 50K | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Tallahassee Ultra Distance Classic 50M | 50 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Indiana

HUFF 50K Trail Run | 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Massachusetts

Seth’s Fat Ass 50 | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Ohio

Bigfoot 50K | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

First Day of Winter 50K | 50 kilometers | December 20, 2015 | website

Oregon

Frozen Trail Runfest 50K | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Tennessee

Bell Ringer 50k | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Lookout Mountain 50 Mile Trail Race | 50 miles | December 19, 2015 | website

Texas

Brazos Bend 100 Miler | 100 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Brazos Bend 50 Miler | 50 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Houston Running Festival 100K | 100 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Houston Running Festival 100 Mile | 100 miles | December 19, 2015 | website

Houston Running Festival 50K | 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Houston Running Festival 50 Mile | 50 miles | December 19, 2015 | website

Texas Trail 50K Run | 50 kilometers | December 12, 2015 | website

Texas Trail 50 Mile Run | 50 miles | December 12, 2015 | website

Virginia

Hellgate 100K | 100 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

Seashore Nature Trail 50K | 50 kilometers | December 19, 2015 | website

Washington

Deception Pass 50K | 50 kilometers | December 13, 2015 | website

03:01:20 CLOSE

03:04:20

ITunes http://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/talk-ultra/id497318073

Libsyn – feed://talkultra.libsyn.com/rss

Website – talkultra.com

Can of worms! Desco, EPO, PEDs and TNF50

©iancorless.com©iancorless.com-3401

It is the TNF50 this weekend in San Francisco. iRunFar as per usual did a race preview and what a line up! The $10,000 prize money a huge incentive to attract top runners for a last big push before a well earned end of season rest.

The iRunFar article was updated on Nov 27th with a last minute entrant: Elisa Desco from Italy.

I firmly believe that many in the San Francisco race would not know who Elisa was unless they followed WMRA (World Mountain Running) or Skyrunning. Elisa in recent years has performed exceptionally well in Skyrunning and in 2014 was crowned Skyrunning World Champion for the SKY distance in Chamonix.

iRunFar went on to say:

[Added November 27] Italian mountain runner Elisa Desco was just added to the entrants list. I don’t believe she’s raced longer than 46k before, I do think this is her first race in the U.S., and I know this will probably be the flattest trail race she’s participated in, but she is a likely podium favorite. She’s been a regular on the international Skyrunning circuit for years, and this year she finished third in the Sky division of the Skyrunner World Series, including a win of the just-over-a-marathon’s-distance Matterhorn Ultraks. From 2010 to 2012, Elisa served a two-year ban from the IAAF after she tested positive for EPO at the 2009 World Mountain Running Championships.

I was well aware of Elisa’s positive test and lets be clear here, since 2012 I have spent a great deal of time with Elisa and her husband, Marco De Gasperi. De Gasperi himself a 6x WMRA champion and legend in the world of mountain and Skyrunning.

Many a long night talking with Marco discussing the positive test. (I would like to be clear here and state that I am being as impartial as I possible can.) It’s a story of how Marco tried to fight to clear Elisa’s name, a story of what he considered major flaws with the testing procedure and a fight for honour. One that he eventually had to give up on. He wrote an article in 2011 on his own website. I provide a Google translation of that article, obviously this is not a perfect translation but you get the gist! HERE

From a USA perspective, Facebook exploded with a series of very angry posts. Ethan Veneklasen in particular commented on multiple channels:

I am DEEPLY disappointed to see that Elisa Desco (Italy) was added last week to the start list for this weekend’s North Face Endurance Challenge and is widely considered a favorite for the podium. From 2010-2012, Desco served a two-year ban from the IAAF for testing positive for EPO at the 2009 World Mountain Running Championships.

For the last several years, we have speculated about whether doping has arrived in our beloved sport. If there was any question before, let me be clear…that day has arrived! This is VERY, VERY sad indeed. 

On a related note, I am delighted to see that US Skyrunning is taking proactive steps to move the International Skyrunning Federation toward enforcing lifetime ban for convicted dopers.

The can of worms was well and truly opened. No bad thing! It’s good to get the PED debate out in our sport and ensure at this very early stage that PED’s are not tolerated or accepted in our sport.

I 100% agree that I do not and will not tolerate drugs in any sport and of course, in particular the sport I love, watch, follow and photograph.

However, is Elisa getting a fair deal? Has this turned into a witch hunt?

The facts are when Elisa tested positive, no lifetime ban existed for doping. She was sentenced for 2-years, she did her time and she is now back. This of course does pose the question, ‘should runners be allowed back?’

Elisa has been drug tested 2-times in the last 18-months (maybe more) and both tests were clean. To clarify, one of those tests were made at the Skyrunning World Championships in Chamonix where she was crowned world champion.

Elisa may very well have taken PED’s? The ban would suggest so but Marco and Elisa 100% say not! Of course, Lance did the same and look how good a liar he was.

Should athletes receive lifetime bans? Yes, if we are 100% sure that they cheated, then yes! But I would want those tests to be 100% secure. I am not sure that is always the case and this has been discussed elsewhere. Questions have been raised about Elisa’s positive test! This is not a post to fight for Elisa, not at all. It’s a post to say that we sometimes need to take a step back and this case provides a great opportunity for debate and a catalyst for change.

Today, 5th December, Runners World have posted an article HERE and the headline says:

Ultrarunners Want Convicted Doper Out of Weekend Race

Powerful headline and some of the contents in the article make for interesting reading. 2014 race winner, Magdalena Boulet says: “I guess the kind way to say it is that I’m disappointed that the race organization allowed her into the elite field,” This was followed up with, “I don’t care if a doper served their ban and are technically eligible to race. If they still want to run for the love of the sport, they are welcome to, but I guarantee that they would slowly go away,”

Fellow podcaster, Eric Shranz commented, “For a sport that values camaraderie and inclusiveness, Desco will be on the outside of that group due to her past, and that’s a place she’s earned,” Schranz said. “But then again, maybe we need her to podium this weekend to really force an honest conversation about how we want to grow as a sport and how we’ll handle the PED problem.”

On publication of the Runners World article, Ethan Veneklasen who was very vocal on social media said via his Facebook page, “Very glad to see Runners World covering this important issue! Thanks to all who have contributed to helping get this discussion going. ‪#‎cleansport‬

I agree. This is a discussion that almost certainly needs to take place. Elisa unfortunately is now at the centre of this debate. Her presence in San Francisco is now compromised and should she decide to run, I can’t help but think it will result in an early withdrawal. This debate and all the negativity will have a huge impact on her and many reading this will say; good!

Four points are raised:

  1. Are The North Face making a mistake in allowing Desco to run? (TNF50 does not have drug testing or a policy re convicted dopers.)
  2. Should a positive test, irrespective of when that happened, mean that a runner should be banned of life?
  3. How do we confirm that a positive test is 100% positive?
  4. The ultra community have a voice, they are saying in this scenario, “Sure the rules say 2yrs and back in, but the community doesn’t!”

I often tell a story, when I was cycling at elite level. Caffeine was a banned substance. If I had too many espressos or too much Coke, I could run the risk of being positive in a test so I had to be careful. Now caffeine is okay and even gels are rammed with the stuff. You can take as much as you like and it does boost performance. But it’s legal now. What is okay and what is not ok becomes cloudy; my advice is stick to the rules. The athletes who really want to perform/ win will always look for an advantage. I just want that advantage to be a legal one. Of course in Elisa’s case the drug in question is EPO, you don’t accidentally take EPO! It would require planning, deception and money. Ultimately this is a completely different story and I firmly believe why the reaction has been so severe.

The positive test is what everyone jumps on, I get that. A definitive proof that Elisa doped!

Like I said, we all make mistakes and I get the ‘one strike and out’ scenario. However, my bank took £22 out of my account years ago. I told them they were wrong in no uncertain terms. ‘No!’ they relied. “It’s not possible for us to make this mistake.’ I battled on for 3-months. It wasn’t the money that was important, it was the principal. Eventually I had a letter from the bank confirming an error had been made due to an ‘anomaly.’

In the above scenario it was just £22. With drugs in sport and PEDS it may well be a ruined career and life ban. Of course, if we can 100% confirm that someone was cheating, lets ban them. I just want a ban to be 100% – are we there yet?

Ian Sharman, race director for the U.S. Skyrunner Series, is pushing for life bans for convicted dopers for all Skyrunning events globally: “This isn’t a reaction to an individual, but a response to the widespread doping uncovered recently in athletics in general. We can’t change our rules at this point without the rules being changed for the entire International Skyrunning Federation, so that’s where we’re aiming to make the change so we can send a clear signal that cheating isn’t acceptable,”

Anthony Forsyth commented on a Facebook in response to a comment I made:

“From my perspective the frustration is not towards Elisa, who is doing what she can, but towards TNF that are allowing her to race. There is a general consensus that we want a clean sport – on this we agree. But there is also a general consensus that those who have cheated, who have stolen prize money and results from other athletes, have had their opportunity to be a part of our sport, of our family, and have crapped with contempt on that opportunity. They are no longer welcome. The term witch hunt refers to the guessing of guilt. Guilt has been proven. Sure the rules say 2yrs and back in, but the community doesn’t. As I said, my vent is with TNF. In allowing her to race they have misunderstood our sport, our family and our values. They need to educate themselves. And people need to stop buying their stuff until they do.”

The above is a powerful statement and one that I get. Anthony is clearly saying here this has nothing to do with if ‘doing the crime, so do the time!’ It is so much more, it’s about how the community are not prepared to accept back someone into the sport even though they may now be clean. It is very much the scenario, one strike and you are out!

On a final note to add fuel to the fire. On December 2nd CONI posted:

The Public Prosecutor’s office of NADO ITALY defers 26 athletes and asks for two years of disqualification. Dismissal is suggested for another 39 cases

Read the article HERE

Dismissal for 39-cases including

DE GASPERI Marco for the disputed accusations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the Anti-Doping Sport Code);

DESCO Elisa for the disputed accusations (art. 2.3 and art. 2.4 of the Anti-Doping Sport Code);

What are your thoughts? Would love to hear them.

Read THIS by Scott athlete, Andy Symonds. He nails it for me!

UPDATE 18th December, ELISA DESCO speaks with competitor.com HERE

NSAIDs and Sport

education_74_2651288118

NSAID (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and Sport

How many of you have gone for a run with a Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug in your pocket for that ‘just in case’ scenario? Maybe you have taken a tablet before going for a run/ race to avoid potential issues? Or possibly you have taken a tablet post run to reduce swelling and inflamation?

It’s a common scenario and one that I am aware off continually when running and racing. I have done it myself… I remember racing and going through pain so I took an Ibuprofen only to be hit by stomach issues later in the race.

Earlier this year, Montane athlete, Marcus Scotney had severe issues post a great run at Iznik Ultra in Turkey. A situation that was potentially life threatening.

In an attempt to provide some clear information, I caught with the UK’s key specialist on kidney function, Dr Richard Fluck to find out what we should and shouldn’t do.

******

IC – NSAIDs what are they?

RF – They are a class of drug that you can purchase over the counter. They are commonly used to treat pain and inflammation. The most common is Ibuprofen but others are available. They are anti-inflammatory.

IC – Let’s remove the sport element. What are the pros and cons of NSAIDs?

RF – Any tablet, has risk and benefit. We need to weigh up the balances. A medical approach to medication is that any drug must be tested, assessed for safety and so on. NSAIDs are really used for arthritis and so on. They have been increasingly used as a method of pain relief. In more recent times, particularly in the UK, you can now buy these drugs over the counter. We are bombarded by adverts on the TV telling us how good they are. So, the tablets are there for a reason. The question is, are you taking them appropriately? NSAIDs are well studied and they have side effects, anyone who takes them needs to be aware of this.

IC – From a runner’s perspective, I am pretty sure we all know someone who has taken Ibuprofen before a race, during a race or post a race to reduce inflammation. Are any of those scenarios ok?

RF – We need to know individual scenarios to be specific, however, I would say all the above scenarios bring a risk. Endurance sport and NSAIDs interfere with the normal regulation of your body. For me as a kidney expert, my concern is with the kidneys. What do NSAIDs do to the kidneys? Kidneys allow us to pass urine, they regulate the water in our body and they regulate salt, particularly sodium and potassium and they regulate toxins that come from everyday life. Of course the kidneys do have other functions… they look after your bones in regard to vitamin D, they regulate blood pressure via hormonal systems and they stimulate bone marrow to boost red blood cells. If the kidneys go wrong it is usually the first category that fails first, so, liquid and salt/ toxin regulation. Now, lets take an individual, I was listening to a chat re football and football players playing in hot climates. It was a chat about regulating salt and water. It can be tricky to judge and get this right. So, the peril for an individual is that they get it wrong one way or the other. It’s particular more of a problem for slower runners. The tendency is not to drink enough or drink too much. For example, Hyponatremia (people over drinking) and not thinking of electrolytes.) So, our kidneys work to help with dehydration or over hydration. The kidney kicks in and helps control this. It’s about regulating salt and water. This is where NSAIDs come in as they can inhibit this. So, if a runner pre loads, takes during or after running and the kidney needs to work then the action can be blocked! So, the danger is that you hang on to fluid, hang on to salts or in fact you increase fluid loss (you pass more urine.)

IC – Lets talk about some scenarios that we can relate to.

RF – So, I told you about fluid… lets talk about salt (sodium and potassium.) So, Hyponatremia (low sodium) is more common in people who take NSAIDs. It’s a real danger. Potassium is less known about, it has low levels in the blood as most is stored in our cells. Potassium for example will know it is in bananas. Potassium is important. NSAIDs can block the kidneys function in controlling potassium levels. I have treated runners in endurance situations where runners have become dehydrated, the kidneys have not worked and potassium levels are high. High potassium can stop your heart! So, I am not trying to terrify anyone but you have important issues to consider.

IC – What are the implications in an ultra event? For example, an event that lasts so much longer than a marathon; hours-and-hours of running. It is possible to pop a NSAID every 4-hours?

RF – The recommendation (RDA) is 400mg 3-times a day! However, I have heard scenarios where people double this dose, for example at Marathon des Sables. That is really going to suppress hormonal mechanisms. If you are a 4-hour runner, you may get away with it but 4-hour does seem to be a cut off point. Obviously, anyone who is out for 4-hours plus has a much greater opportunity to cause issues and problems in regard to salt/ water balance. This risk increases if you bring NSAIDs into the scenario.

IC – I read some research about Western States and it showed that frequent use of drugs caused colonic seepage, what does that do/ mean? Read HERE)

RF – It’s more about the gut! It is interesting because one of the national papers in the UK discussed a scenario about a runner who died on a course. It was a problem with the bowel. I concentrate on kidneys but NSAIDs have wider actions for the whole of your body. NSAIDs can cause ulcers, indigestion and all sorts of mayhem and impact on your bowel. The other interesting thing is that in chronic usage they have an impact on the heart. So, you may be aware of public interest in side effects in some of the newer drugs. How that is mediated I wouldn’t wish to go into it here but one needs to be aware of these things, in particular blood pressure and heart. You know, if you take a tablet a day I wouldn’t recommend it.

IC – What about animal studies that show that NSAIDs can hamper muscle regeneration? (Read HERE)

RF – I need to concentrate on the kidneys. It is my specialisation. Interesting you raise muscles though… if you do a simple search on the web, you will find many cases were people describe kidney failure in ultras. I remember a guy (a runner) who mentioned runners at Western States in the 90’s and his story of acute renal failure is typical of the very severe (but rare) cases were people have total kidney shut down for days or weeks. It can lead to continual problems for example with blood pressure. And that comes about from a combination: First they may be running in unusual circumstances, climate and weather for example. It may be that they are not prepared and they get muscle pain and so they take a NSAID. What happens is that muscle breakdown occurs and that releases a protein into the body called Myoglobin. Our kidneys work by filtering our blood. Myoglobin goes around the body in blood circulation. The kidneys try to eradicate this but it can’t because it isn’t designed to do that! The kidney clogs up and blocks. This is a really dangerous situation.

IC – This is the situation that happened with Montane athlete, Marcus Scotney at Iznik Ultra. He raced a 130km race and I believe he took six NSAID during the race. When he returned to the UK, he felt rough. He went to the doctors and then was submitted to hospital. He had Myoglobin in his kidneys. How serious is that?

RF – It can be life threatening! For example, if Myoglobin is present your urine may well look like Coca Cola (dark brown or black.) Ironically, the kidneys will not have any pain, well, they will give pain but at a very late stage. At this point, your kidneys are just not functioning so you can get into serious trouble particularly if eating and drinking in normal way. I have a scenario of one gentleman who had 50-pints of liquid in his body… this liquid went to his lungs and he couldn’t breathe. He was drowning internally! You can end up in intensive care. The potassium side of things, remember potassium is stored in the cells. Myoglobin is reduced into the blood so potassium levels can become very high, very quickly and I am afraid that can lead to sudden death with no warning.

IC – In Marcus’ case. He was in hospital would they have used dialysis?

RF – I am sure Marcus had great treatment; he may have needed temporary dialysis. I remember a story of a soldier who was on a march with a heavy pack, minimal liquid and so on… he ended up on dialysis.

IC – We have built up a picture here of fear! Is this doom and gloom correct? Do scenarios exist when an NSAID is okay? 

RF – I have painted a picture of terrible scenarios. I have given you the worse case scenario. Please keep in mind that most people do sensible distances for running. The kidney is very forgiving as is the rest of our body. For example, I have taken a NSAID on a run… I have been careful on my drinking, I have been careful that I have passed urine and I have monitored urine colour. These basics can help. The question is; why are you taking the NSAID? Professionals for example can have experts and experience around them; this is very different to an everyday runner. If you are on a very long race, Paracetemol is a safer drug if used sensibly and within RDA guidelines. However, caution is required! However, Paracetemol address mechanical pain and not inflammation.

IC – Interesting that a kidney specialist has taken a NSAID when running. How do you justify that?

RF – I would not pre load with NSAIDs. No evidence that this works. If you have mechanical pain, Paracetemol is better taken sensibly. However, post race if you have inflammation a NSAID may be sensible but you need to monitor urine and keep within RDA. If you feel unwell, you need to seek attention; sooner than later. Be sensible and prepare for a run/ race accordingly. Weighing yourself is actually a good thing for monitoring fluid.

IC – Races like Western States still weigh runners during the race.

RF – That is a reasonable strategy to consider.

IC – Final point I would like to consider, we looked at the doom and gloom scenario and then we have said that knowledge is paramount. But my reaction is, don’t take anything. Ultra runners are not the most clear thinking individuals at 10, 15 and 20+ hours into a race. I remember Marcus saying that he urinated dark urine in the race but still pushed to the finish line… Other than weighing a runner is there anything we can do?

RF – We are getting into medical testing now. That is not practical or sensible for racing. We would need to blood test, we would need to test urine and so on. It just wouldn’t work. You are quite right, we need to take personal responsibility and assess risk against benefit. But do this within an envelope of understanding. I look at my own body and what I can tolerate. Be sensible! Also, other runners need to look after other runners. We need corporate responsibility when running or racing.

More reading:

Read about NSAIDs at Western States HERE

Ibuprofen administration during endurance training cancels running-distance-dependent adaptations of skeletal muscle in mice. HERE

When is it ok to take a NSAID?

During the first 2 to 3-days of an acute injury, taking a NSAID is advised but once you exceed this window, general advice is let your body do the work! It will naturally heal.

Niggling injury pre training or racing? Worried about ‘possible’ pain while running or racing? No evidence shows that a NSAID will be a benefit you and as discussed above, a NSAID may very well hinder your run or race.

Be sensible and keep running or any sport you do natural… a NSAID shouldn’t be required to get you to the finish line!

******

Fluck, Richard. 00-190902

Who is Dr Richard Fluck?

Richard Fluck trained at Trinity Hall, Cambridge and the London Hospital Medical College, qualifying in 1985. Early training was undertaken in the East London area before moving into research at St Bartholomew’s Hospital. He was appointed a British Heart Foundation fellow whilst exploring the link between cardiovascular disease, calcium signalling and abnormalities of calcium metabolism in chronic kidney disease. He returned to the Royal London Hospital as Lecturer and honorary Senior Registrar in Nephrology.
In 1996 he took up post at Derby City Hospital as a single-handed nephrologist. Over the next decade, the department expanded, developing a strong clinical research and safety programme. It has interests in cardiovascular consequences of CKD and dialysis, infection and vascular access. He is involved in the coordination of two cohort studies looking at CKD in primary care (RRID) and the consequences of AKI (ARID). More recent projects include the development of PROMs for renal patients and developing home therapies for patients on dialysis.

Within the acute trust he was clinical lead for renal disease for 15 years and clinical director for medicine, then clinical lead for the East Midlands Renal Network and worked with the DH and HPA on infection in renal disease. He was also the clinical lead for the Kidney Care National audit on vascular access and transport in the haemodialysis population. He was appointed NCD (Renal) April 2013.

He is the immediate past president of the British Renal Society, chair of the Kidney Alliance, on the UK Renal Registry Board, is the UK country co-investigator for the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) and is on the editorial board of Nephron. In 2007, the unit won the Renal Team of the year award, given by Hospital Doctor and the following year received the Health and Social care award for safety in patient care.

******

NSAID – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

The term nonsteroidal distinguishes these drugs from steroids, which, among a broad range of other effects, have a similar eicosanoid-depressing, anti-inflammatory action. As analgesics, NSAIDs are unusual in that they are non-narcotic and thus are used as a non-addictive alternative to narcotics.

The most prominent members of this group of drugs, aspirin, ibuprofen and naproxen, are all available over the counter in most countries. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is generally not considered an NSAID because it has only little anti-inflammatory activity. It treats pain mainly by blocking COX-2 mostly in the central nervous system, but not much in the rest of the body.

NSAIDs inhibit the activity of both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and thereby, the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes. It is thought that inhibiting COX-2 leads to the anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic effects and that those NSAIDs also inhibiting COX-1, particularly aspirin, may cause gastrointestinal bleeding and ulcers. For this reason, the advantages of COX-2 selective inhibitors may be indicated. ©wikipedia

Read about NSAIDs HERE 

Hyponatremia – is defined as a low sodium concentration in the blood. Too little sodium in the diet alone is very rarely the cause of hyponatremia, although it can promote hyponatremia indirectly and has been associated with Ecstasy-induced hyponatremia. Sodium loss can lead to a state of low blood volume, which serves as a signal for the release of anti-diuretic hormone (ADH). ADH release leads to water retention and dilution of the blood resulting in a low sodium concentration.

Exercise-associated hyponatremia (EAH) is common in marathon runners and participants of other endurance events.13% of the athletes who finished the 2002 Boston Marathon were in a hyponatremic state, i.e. their salt levels in their blood had fallen below usual levels.

Sodium is the primary positively charged ion in the environment outside of the cell and cannot freely cross from the interstitial space into the cell. Charged sodium ions attract up to 25 water molecules around them thereby creating a large polar structure that is too large to pass through the cell membrane. Normal serum sodium levels are between approximately 135 and 145 mEq/liter (135 – 145 mmol/L). Hyponatremia is generally defined as a serum sodium level of less than 135 mEq/L and is considered severe when the serum sodium level is below 125 mEq/L.

Many conditions including congestive heart failure, liver failure, kidney failure and pneumonia are commonly associated with a low sodium concentration in the blood. This state can also be caused by over hydration from drinking too much water due to excess thirst (polydipsia). Contents ©wikipedia